Procurement comparison · Updated 2026-06-28
Revita vs. Kindr
Revita (umbilical cord amnion allograft) · StimLabs · Q4216 / Q4220
Kindr Health's amniotic allograft line is offered in both ambient-stable lyophilized and cryopreserved formats with multi-source supply continuity. The comparison below focuses strictly on supply chain, storage, and billing attributes — not clinical efficacy.
Supply chain & storage
- Storage
- Revita: ambient (lyophilized). Kindr lyophilized: ambient.
- Shelf life
- Revita: typically 3+ years ambient. Kindr lyophilized: 3–5 years ambient.
- Cold chain risk
- Neither requires cold chain.
- Sizes
- Both available in standard graft sizes.
Billing & reimbursement
- Q-code
- Revita: confirm current Q-code with manufacturer and MAC.
- Payment basis
- ASP+6% in physician office; OPPS APC packaged in HOPD.
- LCD notes
- Newer placental Q-codes face higher payer scrutiny — verify LCD coverage before committing volume.
Procurement takeaway
Revita and Kindr's lyophilized line are supply chain equivalents. Procurement decision turns on contract pricing, MAC LCD coverage stability, and clinical evidence package fit.
Run side-by-side TCO →Other comparisons
Comparison data drawn from publicly available manufacturer IFUs, product labels, and CMS HCPCS files as of 2026-06-28. Trademarks belong to their respective owners. No clinical superiority is claimed or implied. Verify all data against current manufacturer documentation before procurement decisions.